Teach leaders to work with AI agents and lead teams that include them.
Keep the case discussions and management frameworks your program already teaches. Add practice in assigning work to AI agents and changing the team's rules when AI agents become contributors.
01 · PERSONAL TRACK
Work with AI agents
Participants write an assignment an AI agent can follow, supply the context and sources, and decide where to check progress. They also practice recognizing work they should keep themselves.
Specify the outcome
Check the evidence
Intervene in time
02 · TEAM TRACK
Lead teams of people and AI agents
Participants assign roles to people and AI agents, plan handoffs and make room for disagreement. They set review points for quality, risk and cost, with a named person responsible for the final decision.
Design the roles
Invite dissent
Own the decision
WHAT PROGRAMS ALREADY DO WELL
Practice with people
Discuss a management case
Work in a participant team
Submit a final recommendation
THE PRACTICE TO ADD
Practice with people and AI agents
Delegate to named contributors
Check evidence and AI agent limits
Resolve dissent under a human-owned protocol
Participants practice both roles within the same module.
THE FIRST ENGAGEMENT
One decision. Two records to examine.
The task, source packet, budget and deadline stay the same. What changes is who contributes to the work and how participants handle those contributions.
Capital allocation case
€40M available. €65M requested. The board meets in nine days.
A manufacturer must choose among three requests and explain which risks it is willing to accept.
A€22M
Build a service-parts operation in Southeast Asia
B€18M
Automate the second European plant
C€25M
Acquire a customer-diagnostics software firm
People only
Make and seal the first recommendation.
Participants read the business cases, board minutes and market brief. They allocate the €40 million and sign a one-page recommendation before the second round begins.
Decision record
Recommendation
Allocation of the €40M budget
Evidence
Sources and objections considered
Human ruling
Signed before round two begins
People
Reads the packet
Argues the case
Signs the recommendation
Three people, one signed page. No AI agents in the room yet.
Participants revisit the same case. Compare how delegation, source checks, disagreement, and human decision ownership change across the two attempts, using the same faculty-approved rubric.
The Lab can stand on its own. Broader work begins only if the school decides it would add value.
WHAT THE LAB GIVES YOU
A decision record your faculty can teach from.
The Lab makes each participant's judgment visible inside a team exercise. It also shows you, in one bounded example, where your current assignments, assessment or AI-use rules may need to change.
01
FOR PARTICIPANTS
Practice with accountable AI work
Participants specify work for AI agents, open the sources behind material claims and explain why their recommendation changed or stayed.
02
FOR FACULTY
Evidence for the debrief
Faculty can review who delegated what, which sources were checked, how disagreement was handled and who owned the final decision.
03
FOR THE PROGRAM
See where AI changes the work
You see which parts of one management task changed when AI agents joined, and which parts still required human judgment.
HOW WE PREPARE IT
We build the Lab with faculty, inside approved boundaries.
The work starts from one module you already teach. We prepare and test the operating layer; your faculty own the learning design and every academic decision.
8HATS LAB PROVIDES
Approved course materials prepared for AI use
Configured AI agent roles, tools, permissions and approval points
A faculty-tested exercise and rehearsal
Decision-record templates and a proposed assessment process
Support for the agreed delivery and follow-through
FACULTY AND THE SCHOOL OWN
The framework, case, assignment and rubric
Approved sources and participant or employer data boundaries
Acceptable AI use and human decision rights
Academic delivery, assessment and curriculum ownership
WHERE THE LAB CAN RUN
Run it in the setting you already govern.
The case and learning logic stay consistent. The workspace and control model follow your program context.
SCHOOL PROGRAM
An existing executive program
Runs in an approved participant or 8Hats Lab workspace. Your faculty control the sources, rubric, acceptable AI use and assessment; participant data stays inside the approved workspace.
CORPORATE ACADEMY
A company-specific program
Runs inside the client's approved tools, workspace and data boundaries. Faculty, the sponsor and IT or security agree permissions and decision rights before launch.
WHY 8HATS LAB
Built by people who have worked on assessment, learning systems and AI in production.
The team combines assessment, learning systems, and AI in production in one Lab.
Assessment and operating experience
Dmitriy Istomin founded and led Examus, an AI assessment company acquired by Constructor Tech. Taras Pustovoy chaired the technology committee of the National Platform of Open Education, used by 2.7 million learners, and was a Coursera content partner.
Learning and AI system design
Alexander Volkov, PhD leads our Human-AI Learning Architecture and research design. Mariam Mamedli, PhD turns research questions into AI agent systems that can be tested.
Institutional learning advice
Dale P. Johnson, Senior Director of Digital Innovation at Arizona State University's University Design Institute and former director of ASU's adaptive learning initiatives, advises on institutional learning design and adoption.
If you choose to continue, we work with your faculty to apply what the Lab surfaced. Faculty keep academic control and ownership of the curriculum throughout.
Beyond the Lab: optional work with your faculty
01
Identify modules where AI agents change the management task.
02
Adapt assignments and learning activities around those changes.
03
Make delegation, verification and judgment assessable.
04
Prepare approved AI workspaces and course materials.
05
Agree rules for data, acceptable AI use and decision authority.
06
Plan follow-through where it supports the program.
Executive Education Brief
Get the Executive Education Brief.
Tell us where to send it. We email a link to the PDF to the address you give, and keep that address only to send the brief and to answer you if you write back.
START WITH ONE DECISION
See the Lab before you decide whether it fits.
For the conversation, bring your module, cohort size, available teaching time, and tool or data restrictions. We will discuss whether the Lab fits.